[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2763397.yFrgeYvBXr@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:00:25 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/22] PCI, acpiphp: Separate out hot-add support of pci host bridge
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 07:54:22 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> >>> @@ -673,3 +673,223 @@ int __init acpi_pci_root_init(void)
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> +
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Separated from drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> >>> + * only support root bridge
> >>> + */
> >>
> >> This comment will be useless after applying the patch.
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +static LIST_HEAD(acpi_root_bridge_list);
> >>> +struct acpi_root_bridge {
> >>> + struct list_head list;
> >>> + acpi_handle handle;
> >>> + u32 flags;
> >>> +};
> >>
> >> We have struct acpi_pci_root already. Why do we need this in addition?
> >
> > will address that in following patch.
>
> please check if you are ok with merging attached 5 patches in to one
> patches instead.
Do I understand correctly that you're asking whether to merge the attached
patches together, so as to obtain one combined patch?
If so, yes, I'd like that to be done.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists