[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130115185012.759760397@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:52:11 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>
Subject: [ 204/221] ceph: dont reference req after put
3.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7d5f24812bd182a2471cb69c1c2baf0648332e1f)
In __unregister_request(), there is a call to list_del_init()
referencing a request that was the subject of a call to
ceph_osdc_put_request() on the previous line. This is not
safe, because the request structure could have been freed
by the time we reach the list_del_init().
Fix this by reversing the order of these lines.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>
Reviewed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ceph/osd_client.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -873,9 +873,9 @@ static void __unregister_request(struct
req->r_osd = NULL;
}
+ list_del_init(&req->r_req_lru_item);
ceph_osdc_put_request(req);
- list_del_init(&req->r_req_lru_item);
if (osdc->num_requests == 0) {
dout(" no requests, canceling timeout\n");
__cancel_osd_timeout(osdc);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists