linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] clk: tegra: Add tegra specific clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130116.101906.399662310268585658.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:19:06 +0100
From:	Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To:	"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC:	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	"mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] clk: tegra: Add tegra specific clocks

Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote @ Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:35:28 +0100:

> On 01/11/2013 04:48 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Hi Prahant,
> > 
> > Some nit-pick/cosmetic comments inlined...
> 
> FYI, Prashant is on vacation for the next week or two, so I'll take over
> this series to clean up any last review comments.
> 
> > Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com> wrote @ Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:46:20 +0100:
> > 
> >> Add tegra specific clocks, pll, pll_out, peripheral,
> >> frac_divider, super.
> 
> (it's a good idea to quote as little text as possible; paging through
> the whole patch to find your comments was slightly painful).
> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-audio-sync.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-audio-sync.c
> 
> >> +struct clk *tegra_clk_sync_source(const char *name, unsigned long rate,
> >> +                                 unsigned long max_rate)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct tegra_clk_sync_source *sync;
> >> +       struct clk_init_data init;
> >> +       struct clk *clk;
> >> +
> >> +       sync = kzalloc(sizeof(struct tegra_clk_sync_source), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +       if (!sync) {
> >> +               pr_err("%s: could not allocate sync source clk\n", __func__);
> >> +               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       sync->rate = rate;
> >> +       sync->max_rate = max_rate;
> >> +
> >> +       init.ops = &tegra_clk_sync_source_ops;
> >> +       init.name = name;
> >> +       init.flags = CLK_IS_ROOT;
> >> +       init.parent_names = NULL;
> >> +       init.num_parents = 0;
> >> +
> >> +       sync->hw.init = &init;
> >> +
> >> +       clk = clk_register(NULL, &sync->hw);
> > 
> > The above usage of "init" from stack may be a bit
> > unfamilier. I can guess that its content is copied in clk_register()
> > but it's originally defined in stack. So I just prefer to writing this
> > as below. It may be somewhat explict that we know init is from stack.
> 
> The issue you mention is more about whether "init" is copied from the
> stack or not; simplying changing the initialization to:
> 
> > struct clk *tegra_clk_sync_source(const char *name, unsigned long rate,
> >                                  unsigned long max_rate)
> > {
> >         struct tegra_clk_sync_source *sync;
> >         struct clk_init_data init = {
> >                 .ops = &tegra_clk_sync_source_ops;
> >                 .name = name;
> >                 .flags = CLK_IS_ROOT;
> >                 .parent_names = NULL;
> >                 .num_parents = 0;
> >         };

Also since "init" is allocated from stack, members are expected to be
initialized *zero*. The last 2 lines are not necessary in the above.

         struct clk_init_data init = {
                 .ops = &tegra_clk_sync_source_ops;
                 .name = name;
                 .flags = CLK_IS_ROOT;
         };

> ... doesn't really address that, although it's a perfectly reasonable
> change.
> 
> To address the copying issue, why not just add a comment:

OK

>        /*
>         * This data pointed at by this field is copied by
>         * clk_register(), so a pointer to the stack is OK.
>         */
>        sync->hw.init = &init;
> 
>        clk = clk_register(NULL, &sync->hw);
> 
> I'll make the other changes you suggested.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/