linux-kernel - Re: -next: no resume from suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fw21wkk4.fsf@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:20:43 +0200
From:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: -next: no resume from suspend

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
> On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's)
>>> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with
>>> no_console_suspend is:
>>> i915: No ACPI video bus found
>>>
>>> But I used to see the message always, so this is no difference. Any idea
>>> before I start bisecting?
>> 
>> Well, what's the next message you normally see with no_console_suspend?
>
> [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
>
> Adding DRM and intel guys.

Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might
give us some clues.

Does it work without no_console_suspend?


BR,
Jani.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/