[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1358332441-26859-4-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:34:01 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V5 3/3] tuntap: allow polling/writing/reading when detached
We forbid polling, writing and reading when the file were detached, this may
complex the user in several cases:
- when guest pass some buffers to vhost/qemu and then disable some queues,
host/qemu needs to do its own cleanup on those buffers which is complex
sometimes. We can do this simply by allowing a user can still write to an
disabled queue. Write to an disabled queue will cause the packet pass to the
kernel and read will get nothing.
- align the polling behavior with macvtap which never fails when the queue is
created. This can simplify the polling errors handling of its user (e.g vhost)
In order to achieve this, tfile->tun were not assign to NULL when detached. And
tfile->tun were converted to be RCU protected in order to let the data path can
check whether the file is deated in a lockless manner. This will be used to
prevent the flow caches from being updated for a detached queue.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index c81680d..3f011e0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct tun_file {
unsigned int flags;
u16 queue_index;
struct list_head next;
- struct tun_struct *detached;
+ struct tun_struct __rcu *detached;
};
struct tun_flow_entry {
@@ -295,11 +295,12 @@ static void tun_flow_cleanup(unsigned long data)
}
static void tun_flow_update(struct tun_struct *tun, u32 rxhash,
- u16 queue_index)
+ struct tun_file *tfile)
{
struct hlist_head *head;
struct tun_flow_entry *e;
unsigned long delay = tun->ageing_time;
+ u16 queue_index = tfile->queue_index;
if (!rxhash)
return;
@@ -308,7 +309,7 @@ static void tun_flow_update(struct tun_struct *tun, u32 rxhash,
rcu_read_lock();
- if (tun->numqueues == 1)
+ if (tun->numqueues == 1 || !rtnl_dereference(tfile->detached))
goto unlock;
e = tun_flow_find(head, rxhash);
@@ -384,16 +385,16 @@ static void tun_set_real_num_queues(struct tun_struct *tun)
static void tun_disable_queue(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile)
{
- tfile->detached = tun;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->detached, tun);
list_add_tail(&tfile->next, &tun->disabled);
++tun->numdisabled;
}
static struct tun_struct *tun_enable_queue(struct tun_file *tfile)
{
- struct tun_struct *tun = tfile->detached;
+ struct tun_struct *tun = rtnl_dereference(tfile->detached);
- tfile->detached = NULL;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->detached, NULL);
list_del_init(&tfile->next);
--tun->numdisabled;
return tun;
@@ -402,26 +403,27 @@ static struct tun_struct *tun_enable_queue(struct tun_file *tfile)
static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
{
struct tun_file *ntfile;
- struct tun_struct *tun;
+ struct tun_struct *tun, *detached;
struct net_device *dev;
tun = rtnl_dereference(tfile->tun);
+ detached = rtnl_dereference(tfile->detached);
- if (tun) {
+ if (tun && !detached) {
u16 index = tfile->queue_index;
BUG_ON(index >= tun->numqueues);
dev = tun->dev;
rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[index],
tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues - 1]);
- rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, NULL);
ntfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[index]);
ntfile->queue_index = index;
--tun->numqueues;
- if (clean)
+ if (clean) {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, NULL);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
- else
+ } else
tun_disable_queue(tun, tfile);
synchronize_net();
@@ -429,7 +431,7 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
/* Drop read queue */
skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_receive_queue);
tun_set_real_num_queues(tun);
- } else if (tfile->detached && clean) {
+ } else if (detached && clean) {
tun = tun_enable_queue(tfile);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
}
@@ -466,6 +468,10 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev)
rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, NULL);
--tun->numqueues;
}
+ list_for_each_entry(tfile, &tun->disabled, next) {
+ wake_up_all(&tfile->wq.wait);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, NULL);
+ }
BUG_ON(tun->numqueues != 0);
synchronize_net();
@@ -496,7 +502,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file)
goto out;
err = -EINVAL;
- if (rtnl_dereference(tfile->tun))
+ if (rtnl_dereference(tfile->tun) && !rtnl_dereference(tfile->detached))
goto out;
err = -EBUSY;
@@ -504,7 +510,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file)
goto out;
err = -E2BIG;
- if (!tfile->detached &&
+ if (!rtnl_dereference(tfile->detached) &&
tun->numqueues + tun->numdisabled == MAX_TAP_QUEUES)
goto out;
@@ -521,7 +527,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file)
rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues], tfile);
tun->numqueues++;
- if (tfile->detached)
+ if (rtnl_dereference(tfile->detached))
tun_enable_queue(tfile);
else
sock_hold(&tfile->sk);
@@ -1195,7 +1201,7 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
tun->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
tun->dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
- tun_flow_update(tun, rxhash, tfile->queue_index);
+ tun_flow_update(tun, rxhash, tfile);
return total_len;
}
@@ -1796,7 +1802,7 @@ static int tun_set_queue(struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
rtnl_lock();
if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_ATTACH_QUEUE) {
- tun = tfile->detached;
+ tun = rtnl_dereference(tfile->detached);
if (!tun) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto unlock;
@@ -1807,7 +1813,8 @@ static int tun_set_queue(struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
ret = tun_attach(tun, file);
} else if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_DETACH_QUEUE) {
tun = rtnl_dereference(tfile->tun);
- if (!tun || !(tun->flags & TUN_TAP_MQ))
+ if (!tun || !(tun->flags & TUN_TAP_MQ) ||
+ rtnl_dereference(tfile->detached))
ret = -EINVAL;
else
__tun_detach(tfile, false);
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists