linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130116105327.GA16543@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:53:27 +0000
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
Cc:	"'Linux ARM Kernel'" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"'Linux IOMMU'" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"'Linux Kernel'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'Linux Samsung SOC'" <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'Kukjin Kim'" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	"'Hyunwoong Kim'" <khw0178.kim@...sung.com>,
	"'Prathyush'" <prathyush.k@...sung.com>,
	"'Joerg Roedel'" <joro@...tes.org>,
	"'Subash Patel'" <supash.ramaswamy@...aro.org>,
	"'Rahul Sharma'" <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System
 MMU driver with DT

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 01:53:15AM +0000, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> notice: v6 patch-set is rebased on next/iommu-exynos branch of
> linux-samsung.git.  This patch-set does not include 2 patches (05 and 06
> patches in v5 patch-se) because they alread exist already in the branch.

Given that devicetree-discuss has been notably absent from discussion
surrounding the proposed binding, I think that including that patch in
linux-samsung.git and dropping it from this series is rather premature.

I have comments on the binding, so I'll dig up the version you posted in v5
and add devicetree-discuss to CC.

> The current exynos-iommu(System MMU) driver does not work autonomously
> since it is lack of support for power management of peripheral blocks.
> For example, MFC device driver must ensure that its System MMU is disabled
> before MFC block is power-down not to invalidate IOTLB in the System MMU
> when I/O memory mapping is changed. Because A System MMU is resides in the
> same H/W block, access to control registers of System MMU while the H/W
> block is turned off must be prohibited.
> 
> This set of changes solves the above problem with setting each System MMUs
> as the parent of the device which owns the System MMU to recieve the
> information when the device is turned off or turned on.
> 
> Another big change to the driver is the support for devicetree.
> The bindings for System MMU is described in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/system-mmu.txt

This should probably be Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/ no?

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/