[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3526578.G50o11JbOu@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:49:32 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: check zero length in acpi_rs_get_aml_length
Hi,
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:15:28 PM Jiri Slaby wrote:
> There is a bug somewhere in the code that does not set the resource
> length. This makes the loop in acpi_rs_get_aml_length to loop forever.
> So it is a good thing to have the check even if the bug is fixed.
This needs to go through ACPICA upstream (Bob CCed).
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpica/rscalc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/rscalc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/rscalc.c
> index da178b4..c128f2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/rscalc.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/rscalc.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ acpi_rs_get_aml_length(struct acpi_resource * resource, acpi_size * size_needed)
>
> /* Validate the descriptor type */
>
> - if (resource->type > ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_MAX) {
> + if (resource->type > ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_MAX ||
> + WARN_ON(!resource->length)) {
So this cannot be a WARN_ON().
> return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE);
> }
>
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists