[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358346645.8203.408.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:30:45 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] efi, x86: Pass a proper identity mapping in
efi_call_phys_prelog
(Sorry for the delay in replying to this)
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:02 -0600, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> Update efi_call_phys_prelog to install an identity mapping of all available
> memory. This corrects a bug on very large systems with more then 512 GB in
> which bios would not be able to access addresses above not in the mapping.
>
> The result is a crash that looks much like this.
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000000effd870020
> IP: [<0000000078bce331>] 0x78bce330
> PGD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU 0
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 3.8.0-rc1-next-20121224-medusa_ntz+ #2 Intel Corp. Stoutland Platform
> RIP: 0010:[<0000000078bce331>] [<0000000078bce331>] 0x78bce330
> RSP: 0000:ffffffff81601d28 EFLAGS: 00010006
> RAX: 0000000078b80e18 RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 0000000000000004
> RDX: 0000000078bcf958 RSI: 0000000000002400 RDI: 8000000000000000
> RBP: 0000000078bcf760 R08: 000000effd870000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 00000000000000c3 R12: 0000000000000030
> R13: 000000effd870000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88effd870000
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88effe400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000000effd870020 CR3: 000000000160c000 CR4: 00000000000006b0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process swapper/0 (pid: 0, threadinfo ffffffff81600000, task ffffffff81614400)
> Stack:
> 0000000078b80d18 0000000000000004 0000000078bced7b ffff880078b81fff
> 0000000000000000 0000000000000082 0000000078bce3a8 0000000000002400
> 0000000060000202 0000000078b80da0 0000000078bce45d ffffffff8107cb5a
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8107cb5a>] ? on_each_cpu+0x77/0x83
> [<ffffffff8102f4eb>] ? change_page_attr_set_clr+0x32f/0x3ed
> [<ffffffff81035946>] ? efi_call4+0x46/0x80
> [<ffffffff816c5abb>] ? efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x1f5/0x305
> [<ffffffff816aeb24>] ? start_kernel+0x34a/0x3d2
> [<ffffffff816ae5ed>] ? repair_env_string+0x60/0x60
> [<ffffffff816ae2be>] ? x86_64_start_reservations+0xba/0xc1
> [<ffffffff816ae120>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120
> [<ffffffff816ae419>] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0x154/0x163
> Code: Bad RIP value.
> RIP [<0000000078bce331>] 0x78bce330
> RSP <ffffffff81601d28>
> CR2: 000000effd870020
> ---[ end trace ead828934fef5eab ]---
>
> v2: I noticed a typo on the one sent friday, also ccing the stable tree.
>
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
The last time that the topic of introducing a proper identity pagetable
came up was here,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/5/253
mainly in the context of some firmware requiring physical mappings for
I/O devices to persist even after we've called SetVirtualAddressMap().
It turns out that there's a bunch of places in the kernel that want this
identity mapping - the one you've pointed out being yet another.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index 95fd505..2b20038 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/fixmap.h>
>
> -static pgd_t save_pgd __initdata;
> +static pgd_t *save_pgd __initdata;
> static unsigned long efi_flags __initdata;
>
> static void __init early_code_mapping_set_exec(int executable)
> @@ -61,12 +61,20 @@ static void __init early_code_mapping_set_exec(int executable)
> void __init efi_call_phys_prelog(void)
> {
> unsigned long vaddress;
> + int pgd;
> + int n_pgds;
>
> early_code_mapping_set_exec(1);
> local_irq_save(efi_flags);
> - vaddress = (unsigned long)__va(0x0UL);
> - save_pgd = *pgd_offset_k(0x0UL);
> - set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(0x0UL), *pgd_offset_k(vaddress));
> +
> + n_pgds = DIV_ROUND_UP((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), PGDIR_SIZE);
> + save_pgd = kmalloc(n_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t), GFP_KERNEL);
There's potential for this to be called under a spinlock, e.g. from
phys_efi_get_time(). Maybe this should be GFP_ATOMIC?
> + for (pgd = 0; pgd < n_pgds; pgd++) {
> + save_pgd[pgd] = *pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE);
> + vaddress = (unsigned long)__va(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE);
> + set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE), *pgd_offset_k(vaddress));
> + }
> __flush_tlb_all();
> }
>
> @@ -75,7 +83,11 @@ void __init efi_call_phys_epilog(void)
> /*
> * After the lock is released, the original page table is restored.
> */
> - set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(0x0UL), save_pgd);
> + int pgd;
> + int n_pgds = DIV_ROUND_UP((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) , PGDIR_SIZE);
> + for (pgd = 0; pgd < n_pgds; pgd++)
> + set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE), save_pgd[pgd]);
> + kfree(save_pgd);
> __flush_tlb_all();
> local_irq_restore(efi_flags);
> early_code_mapping_set_exec(0);
I initially wrote a patch that was a little like this but Peter
suggested making use of trampoline_pgd on x86-64 and switching between
pagetables with CR3. While that's certainly the approach we should take
going forward, this patch does look pretty trivial (making it suitable
for stable) and it fixes a crash.
So unless anyone's got an objection I'm happy to queue this up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists