[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130116145530.GU23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:55:30 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc: balbi@...com, sameo@...ux.intel.com, tony@...mide.com,
sshtylyov@...sta.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kishon@...com, bjorn@...k.no,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/22] mfd: omap-usb-tll: Clean up clock handling
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:43:35PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tll->lock, flags);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < tll->nch; i++) {
> + char clkname[] = "usb_tll_hs_usb_chx_clk";
> + struct clk *fck;
> +
> + snprintf(clkname, sizeof(clkname),
> + "usb_tll_hs_usb_ch%d_clk", i);
> + fck = clk_get(dev, clkname);
NAK. Why are you doing this under a spinlock?
clk_get() takes a mutex. You must not be in an atomic region (iow, you
must not be holding a spinlock, and you must not have IRQs disabled)
when you call clk_get().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists