[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F6D3D2.3020407@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:22:42 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module, async: async_synchronize_full() on module init
iff async is used
> But no, it's not just some trivial one-liner. Especially the question
> about "when to try to load the module that is given on the kernel
> command line" is not trivial. Do we require that the module is in the
> initrd and loadable basically immediate at boot? Do we try again after
> switching the root filesystem? Things like that..
to load it from the root fs you tend to need... an elevator ;-)
I think it's pretty fair to users to say that if you want something by default at boot time,
you need to build it in...
but for us to try a modprobe from the initrd is not too bad I suppose.
probably need to do this around the time we initialize the block layer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists