[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F6CE7E.4090807@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:59:58 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, alan@...ux.intel.com,
jirislaby@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] TTY: switch flipping functions to tty_port
On 01/16/2013 04:44 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:37 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Steven, do you have any plans with the driver? What is its planned destiny?
>
> Well, I'm currently using the device in my main machine. As it is my
> main box, I don't update the kernel as often.
>
> Let me know what I need to do to fix it in the current kernel.
Every port in the system has to have its struct tty_port counterpart.
/me looked into the code
OMG. It contains a true copy of serial_core!
In the beginning (to remove the BROKEN flag), what it needs is struct
tty_port to be added to struct sb_uart_info. It obviously needs
tty_port_init + tty_port_destroy at appropriate places. Then it needs
tty_register_device to be switched to tty_port_register_device.
Finally, having the tty_port, all tty flipping functions take the
tty_port, not tty_struct (the build errors reported). This is easy while
you have a tty_port.
In the long term, it needs to get rid of the all the pseudo-uart* stuff
(the copy of serial_core) and use only tty layer+tty_port helpers.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists