linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf: Verify signature of signed elf binary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1358365044.4593.186.camel@falcor1>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:37:24 -0500
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjones@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	dhowells@...hat.com, jwboyer@...hat.com,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Ryan Ware <ryan.r.ware@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf: Verify signature of signed elf binary

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 13:57 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:45:12PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> [..]
> > > Given the fact that signatures are stored in extended attributes, to me
> > > the only way to sign executables in current IMA framework would to be
> > > prepare file system image at build server and ship that image. And
> > > then installer simply mounts that image (after making sure that proper
> > > verification keys have been loaded in kernel).
> > 
> > That is one scenario.  Another scenario is to update packages to include
> > extended attributes and to write those extended attributes on
> > installation.
> 
> Ok, that's the point I am missing. So I can sign a file and signatures
> are in a separate file. And these signatures are installed in extended
> attributes at file installation time (IOW rpm installation time) on
> target.
> 
> If all this works, this sounds reasonable so far. Except the point of
> disabling ptrace and locking down memory. 
> 
> So what's the state of above work. Is there something I can play with.

Sorry, I'm not sure of the RPM implementation details of where/how the
signatures are stored in the package, nor of the status of these
changes.  Perhaps someone else on the mailing list knows.

thanks,

Mimi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/