[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130117041633.GA21551@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:16:33 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, sedat.dilek@...il.com,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs.
fb_notifier_list.rwsem
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:54:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > FWIW, Andrew took my patch in mm:
> > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-rework-locking-to-fix-lock-ordering-on-takeover.patch
> > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-yet-another-band-aid-for-fixing-lockdep-mess.patch
> >
> >
> > Ok, so, which one should I take for 3.8? And ideally the fb maintainer
> > should do this, not I, right?
>
> Please see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg08954.html
>
> Tomi might be able to review the above for us. I think we need both.
> If nothing else happens I intend to send both Linuswards for 3.8 in a
> week or two.
Ok, that sounds fine with me, thanks for doing that.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists