[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F75349.2050609@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:26:33 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: werner <w.landgraf@...ru>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.8-rc1: compiling problem in perf-event-p6.o
On 01/15/13 06:50, werner wrote:
> We are now on -rc3 and someone should correct this, finally
>
> This is a regression, it was not before, on 3.6
>
> This messes up any compilation of the whole kernel, it results in don't be produced vmlinuz
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o depends on so much things that I don't get it switched off, I suppose it's necesary for the most systems
>
>
> W.Landgraf
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =================
> The problem continues with 3.8-rc
>
> This is grave, no vmlinuz is produced.
>
>
> wl
>
> CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.o
> CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.o
> CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c:22: error: p6_hw_cache_event_ids causes a section type conflict
> make[3]: [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o] Error 1 (ignored)
> CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.o
> CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.o
> CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.o
>
> ================================================
> There ocurs a compiling error in perf-event-p6.o , any regression, unfortunately I lost the compiling list but I think it was any incompatibility / redefinition with something else, pls check and correct that, if not already done
> W.Landgraf
Hi,
I don't see this problem on 3.8-rc1 or -rc3.
Maybe a difference/problem in gcc??
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists