[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda6dqAj+DzrMCnKET7Z9PtuW0+k9ea3YDL8Z1D=oFVRpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:15:24 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] gpio: introduce descriptor-based interface
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> I've tried to find platforms that don't yet use GPIOLIB and fortunately
> there are very few left:
>
> I found two that provide the generic gpio interfaces when gpiolib
> is disabled, but use gpiolib otherwise for the same hardware,
> arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfgpio.h and arch/blackfin/include/asm/gpio.h.
> I would assume that we can simply remove the non-gpiolib shortcut
> here at cost of a small overhead.
Geert/Greg: interested in looking into this issue?
The GPIO maintainers want to get rid of non-gpiolib platforms.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists