[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <50F8050C02000078000B6D33@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:05:00 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Matt Wilson" <msw@...zon.com>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <annie.li@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/grant-table: Force to use v1 of
grants.
>>> On 17.01.13 at 13:22, Matt Wilson <msw@...zon.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:22:49PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> We have the framework to use v2, but there are no backends that
>> actually use it. The end result is that on PV we use v2 grants
>> and on PVHVM v1. The v1 has a capacity of 512 grants per page while
>> the v2 has 256 grants per page. This means we lose about 50%
>> capacity - and if we want more than 16 VIFs (each VIF takes
>> 512 grants), then we are hitting the max per guest of 32.
>>
>> Note: The hypervisor provides an over-ride for the default
>> of 32 frames (pages) per guest: gnttab_max_nr_frames=X
>
> I think it would be better if the dom0/service domain and hypervisor
> prevent the guest from setting the version to 2 if the backend isn't
> going to make use of them. In the short term, we could add a Xen
> option to limit the supported version to 1.
But that's something each guest has to decide for itself.
Anyway - if no-one's using v2, what did it get introduced for
(not only in the hypervisor, but also in the kernel)? I thought
the networking drivers were intended to make use of it...
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists