[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F848B3.9050800@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:53:39 -0500
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pkondeti@...eaurora.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Herton Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REVERT][v3.x.y] EHCI: Update qTD next pointer in QH overlay
region during unlink
On 01/17/2013 01:51 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 01:34:41PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please consider reverting commit
>> 3d037774b42ed677f699b1dce7d548d55f4e4c2b in mainline as well as in
>> the current stable releases. It was included upstream as of
>> v3.6-rc6. This commit introduced a regression, described in the
>> following bug report:
>>
>> http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088733
>>
>> Reverting commit 3d037774b42ed677f699b1dce7d548d55f4e4c2b in the
>> v3.2 kernel has been confirmed to resolve the aforementioned bug.
>
> If it's wrong in mainline then the revert needs to be done there
> and cc'd to stable. We only revert directly in stable branches if
> the revert is not appropriate in mainline.
>
> Ben.
>
Hi Ben,
Understood. Thanks for the feedback. I'll resend as a patch to mainline.
Thanks,
Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists