linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/86] drivers/net/ethernet/seeq: remove depends on CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130117.150122.2295173415520467788.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:01:22 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	keescook@...omium.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/86] drivers/net/ethernet/seeq: remove depends on
 CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:03:40 -0800

> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> Partially CC:'ing a mailing list for a subset of patches, without also
>> CC:'ing that list on your openning "00/xxx" email explaing what you're
>> doing and why is kind of pointless.
> 
> Hm? 0/86 got sent to lkml: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/16/845
> 
> If you mean I didn't CC each of the people on the 0/86 email, yeah,
> that was intentional since it's a long list of people and lkml tends
> to drop emails with giant CC lists. I figured this was the sanest of
> the various sub-optional solutions.

Just CC: the relevant mailing lists.

Not everyone reads lkml, even I don't, it's too much noise and makes
me less effective in my work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/