[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000013c4a64146b-68cd6f7d-f7e2-460b-9ee5-d931714ce062-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:22:18 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] slub: Check for page NULL before doing the node_match
check
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Anyway, looking at where this crashed, it seems that the page variable
> can be NULL when passed to the node_match() function (which does not
> check if it is NULL). When this happens we get the above panic.
>
> As page is only used in slab_alloc() to check if the node matches, if
> it's NULL I'm assuming that we can say it doesn't and call the
> __slab_alloc() code. Is this a correct assumption?
c->page should only be NULL when c->freelist == NULL but obviously there
are race conditions where c->freelist may not have been zapped but c->page
was.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists