linux-kernel - softirq: No local_irq_save() in local_bh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGZFCEFX8RzTN1DkGpxkeFqNG-+QWVaus7-B__nQEi75DpY2CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:51:23 +0530
From:	ratheesh kannoth <ratheesh.ksz@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: softirq: No local_irq_save() in local_bh_enable()

Hi list,

Below was quoted from
http://linux-kernel.2935.n7.nabble.com/PATCH-softirq-Use-local-irq-save-in-local-bh-enable-td383387.html

"Anyway, a commit 0f476b6d91a1395bda6464e653ce66ea9bea7167 "softirq:
remove irqs_disabled warning from local_bh_enable" can break things
after changing from local_irq_save() to local_irq_disable(). Before
this commit there was only a warning, now a lockup is possible, so
it could be treated as a regression. This patch reverts the change
in irqs. "

But i could not see the usage  of local_irq_save() in newer kernels (
3.7.3 ). Could you please tell me , why we did not take this patch ?

-Ratheesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/