[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130118121336.GE4672@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:13:36 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: kishon <kishon@...com>
CC: <balbi@...com>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <rob@...dley.net>,
<tony@...mide.com>, <b-cousson@...com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers: usb: phy: add a new driver for usb part of
control module
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:40:04PM +0530, kishon wrote:
> >>+void omap_control_usb_host_mode(struct device *dev)
> >>+{
> >>+ u32 val;
> >>+ struct omap_control_usb *control_usb = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >>+
> >>+ val = AVALID | VBUSVALID;
> >>+
> >>+ writel(val, control_usb->otghs_control);
> >
> >I would like to make this future proof too:
> >
> >val = readl(ctrl->otghs_control);
> >val |= OMAP_CTRL_DEV_AVALID | OMAP_CTRL_DEV_VBUSVALID;
> >writel(val, ctrl->otghs_control);
>
> I think we might then have to add
> val &= ~(IDDIG | SESSEND) right?
right, my bad ;-)
> >Another idea is to try to get the extra resource below, if it fails you
> >try to continue without it ;-)
>
> I prefer the way it is now because mailbox is needed for MUSB to be
> functional in OMAP4 and we should fail if we don't have it. No?
could be, that would mean an error on DT data though.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists