[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130118140902.GD1579@krava>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:09:02 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf stat: add interval printing
SNIP
> >> - if (status != -1)
> >> + if (status != -1 && !interval)
> >> print_stat(argc, argv);
> >
> > The way this is done prevents final stats to be printed,
> > which seems unfortunate.
> >
> This is on purpose. All we care about here is the spaced deltas.
> Note that I also removed the shadow stats. Tried to make them
> work for a while but it did not make sense especially for -a -A.
> I don't think it even works right now.
>
> > Actually I don't mind that much, because I haven't even thought about
> > this feature, but looks like it could be done separately with no affect
> > to final counts.
> >
> Initially I had it as raw_counts, prev_raw_counts. But then it would
> cause problems with the stats. So I simplified everything, it uses
> less memory and gives me the output I care about.
>
> If you want total count, then don't use this new option. The results
> are to be fed to a plotter, so the final counts are useless and complicate
> the post-processing.
ok, agreed
jirka
>
> > But since you probably use it mostly for feeding some graph ploting
> > program, it's probably fine.. just feels wrong ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists