[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49obgmif7w.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:16:35 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com> writes:
> This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for
> review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up
> where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel
> and adding support more file systems.
[snip]
> My hopes are that this patchset is finally ready for linux-next.
Hi, Shaggy,
I'm finally getting around to testing this using xfstests. This is my
setup:
dd if=/dev/zero of=testdev.img bs=1M count=1024
dd if=/dev/zero of=scratchdev.img bs=1M count=1024
losetup -f ./testdev.img
losetup -f ./scratchdev.img
mkfs -t xfs /dev/loop0
mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/test
export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
I then ran:
./check -g aio
and here is the summary:
Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240
Failures: 112 198 207 239 240
Failed 5 of 11 tests
To be fair, I have not yet run this on a kernel without your changes.
I'm going to do that next, but wanted to give you a heads-up, in case
you had time to dig into the failures. Let me know if you want the full
output from the run, but I assume you'll want to reproduce this anyway.
Oh, I pulled your git branch into a 3.8.0-rc4 kernel tree, FYI.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists