linux-kernel - Re: [[PATCH v2]] OMAP: omap4-panda: add WiLink shared transport power functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:36:35 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
Cc:	"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, balbi@...com,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [[PATCH v2]] OMAP: omap4-panda: add WiLink shared transport
 power functions

* Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com> [130118 01:03]:
> On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 15:16 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com> [130117 10:04]:
> > > But this patch is pretty small and simple, so why not include it to at
> > > least fix the breakage in 3.7 and 3.8? Whether you take it or not now
> > > won't make any difference in the 5k LOC in these kernel versions.
> > 
> > Well we are planning to drop the non-DT support for omap4 as soon as it's
> > usable with DT. For omap4 we are only carrying SDP and panda support to
> > make this transition easier. The only bindings missing AFAIK are wl12xx and
> > USB.
> 
> In my view this is a regression and it should be fixed with as simple a
> patch as possible.  The alternative to my solution is to revert the
> patch that removed the enable/disable from the ti-st driver *and* fix
> u-boot, because if it doesn't mux the UART2 pins properly (and it
> doesn't) the shared transport still won't work.

Fixing the muxing here makes sense naturally as we cannot do that in the driver
until we've flipped things over to use DT.

But I don't think we should fix the driver regression by adding more platform
callbacks as we are getting rid of them anyways.

> > If we add this, then it implies we're somehow supporting it, which is not
> > the way to go IMHO as we need to get rid of these platform callbacks instead.
> 
> It's a regression fix, not a new feature.  I also think these callbacks
> are silly, but it's the quickest solution I found for 3.7 and 3.8.

Right, so how about let's fix the regression in the driver, and add the
muxing to platform init code? 
 
> > What's your estimate of having minimal wl12xx WLAN DT binding available?
> 
> To tell you the truth, I haven't even started looking into DT for wl12xx
> myself.  So I have no idea when it will be ready.  Benoit has been
> looking into it, but I don't know how far he is.

If it's going to take long we should just init the platform data for
it temporarily even in the DT boot case until the binding is available.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/