linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: zcache: rename ramster to zcache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130118204655.GC4788@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:46:55 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
Cc:	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, ngupta@...are.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
	sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, minchan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: zcache: rename ramster to zcache

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:26:34AM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> In staging, rename ramster to zcache
> 
> The original zcache in staging was a "demo" version, and this new zcache
> is a significant rewrite.  While certain disagreements were being resolved,
> both "old zcache" and "new zcache" needed to reside in the staging tree
> simultaneously.  In order to minimize code change and churn, the newer
> version of zcache was temporarily merged into the "ramster" staging driver
> which, prior to that, had at one time heavily leveraged the older version
> of zcache.  So, recently, "new zcache" resided in the ramster directory.
> 
> Got that? No? Sorry, temporary political compromises are rarely pretty.
> 
> The older version of zcache is no longer being maintained and has now
> been removed from the staging tree.  So now the newer version of zcache
> can rightfully reclaim sole possession of the name "zcache".
> 
> This patch is simply a manual:
> 
>   # git mv drivers/staging/ramster drivers/staging/zcache
> 
> so the actual patch diff has been left out.
> 
> Because a git mv loses history, part of the original description of
> the changes between "old zcache" and "new zcache" is repeated below:

git mv does not loose history, it can handle it just fine.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/