[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMP5XgejeqgPaeM=Pqus7O_KfsawP6kKWSDytcenb+gWwqOrfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:32:46 -0800
From: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Serban Constantinescu <serban.constantinescu@....com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] staging: alarm-dev: Cleanups and compat_ioctl
support (v2)
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:09 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 01/17/2013 04:48 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:46:21PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is the second revision at implementing compat_ioctl support for
>>> Android's alarm-dev driver in staging.
>>>
>>> The first patch removes the pre-Android 1.0 _OLD ioctls, per Colin's
>>> suggestion. Then the second patch does some refactoring to cleanup
>>> and separate the copying of user data from the logic, and the final
>>> patch adds the compat_ioctl support.
>>>
>>> I've tested this with a trivial unit test compiled for both 32bit
>>> and 64bit on a x86_64 kernel, and it looks ok, but closer review
>>> would be appreciated to make sure I didn't break anything.
>>>
>>> Additional feedback or thoughts would be welcome!
>>
>> These look fine to me, want me to apply them to my -next tree for 3.9?
>
>
> Yea, sure. I was going to resend tomorrow without the RFC tag.
>
> Colin, Arve: No objections?
>
Looks OK to me, but have not tested them.
--
Arve Hjønnevåg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists