[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x4938xyi2mm.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:48:33 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com> writes:
> On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> writes:
>>
>>> ./check -g aio
>>>
>>> and here is the summary:
>>>
>>> Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240
>>> Failures: 112 198 207 239 240
>>> Failed 5 of 11 tests
>>>
>>> To be fair, I have not yet run this on a kernel without your changes.
>>
>> I re-ran the same test against a vanilla 3.8.0-rc4 kernel and it passed:
>>
>> Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240
>> Passed all 11 tests
>>
>> I'll start digging into the failures.
>
> Thanks, I'll take a look at it too.
Note that the failures occur on regular block devices, too; this isn't
restricted to loop. The fix I mentioned in reply to patch 17 actually
fixes all of the failures reported in the aio group. I'm going to do
some more thorough testing over the weekend.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists