[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1449960.YISN9L5GZD@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:08:07 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 7/8] PCI/PCIe: add "pci=nopciehp" to disable PCIe native hotplug
On Friday, January 18, 2013 09:50:59 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> > If you want "pci=nopciehp" as a way for users to deal with this
> > problem by forcing the use of acpiphp, I object. Windows manages to
> > make these slots work without having users do anything special, so we
> > should be able to do it, too.
>
> Agreed.
>
> We need to think that more.
>
> I think that we should fix acpiphp, and should follow first come and
> first serve for acpiphp and pciehp.
That would introduce regressions for some users, though.
I actually think we should merge acpiphp with pciehp and make one driver that
can use both types of signalling. There would be a problem with getting
notifications for the same event from both sources, but that doesn't seem to
be unsolvable.
And I don't think that that one combined driver should be modular.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists