[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6973144.kJtd4z8pn4@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:20:28 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130117:
> >
> > Undropped tree: samung
> >
> > The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
> >
> > The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge
> > fix patch.
> >
> > The gpio-lw tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> > next-20130117.
> >
> > The samsung tree lost the majority of its conflicts but gained more
> > against the arm-soc and slave-dma tree.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> From my dmesg diff-file:
>
> +[ 288.730849] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> +[ 294.050498] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.04 seconds) done.
> +[ 294.097024] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
> +[ 314.098849] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks
> refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
> +[ 314.098862] jbd2/loop0-8 D ffffffff8180d780 0 297 2 0x00000000
> +[ 314.098865] ffff880117ec5b68 0000000000000046 ffff880117ec5b08
> ffffffff81044c29
> +[ 314.098868] ffff88011829dc80 ffff880117ec5fd8 ffff880117ec5fd8
> ffff880117ec5fd8
> +[ 314.098871] ffff880119b34560 ffff88011829dc80 ffff880117ec5b68
> ffff88011fad4738
> +[ 314.098873] Call Trace:
> +[ 314.098881] [<ffffffff81044c29>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
> +[ 314.098885] [<ffffffff811c63e0>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x30
> +[ 314.098888] [<ffffffff816b4b59>] schedule+0x29/0x70
> +[ 314.098890] [<ffffffff816b4c2f>] io_schedule+0x8f/0xd0
> +[ 314.098892] [<ffffffff811c63ee>] sleep_on_buffer+0xe/0x20
> +[ 314.098896] [<ffffffff816b342f>] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90
> +[ 314.098898] [<ffffffff811c5aa1>] ? submit_bh+0x121/0x1e0
> +[ 314.098900] [<ffffffff811c63e0>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x30
> +[ 314.098903] [<ffffffff816b34dc>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x7c/0x90
> +[ 314.098906] [<ffffffff8107eb00>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x40/0x40
> +[ 314.098909] [<ffffffff811c63de>] __wait_on_buffer+0x2e/0x30
> +[ 314.098913] [<ffffffff8128a6a1>]
> jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x1791/0x1960
> +[ 314.098917] [<ffffffff8109269d>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xbd/0x110
> +[ 314.098920] [<ffffffff8107eac0>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
> +[ 314.098923] [<ffffffff81069fbf>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x4f/0x70
> +[ 314.098925] [<ffffffff8128e4e8>] kjournald2+0xb8/0x240
> +[ 314.098927] [<ffffffff8107eac0>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
> +[ 314.098929] [<ffffffff8128e430>] ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10
> +[ 314.098931] [<ffffffff8107ded0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
> +[ 314.098933] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
> +[ 314.098936] [<ffffffff816be52c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> +[ 314.098938] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
> +[ 314.098969]
> +[ 314.098970] Restarting kernel threads ... done.
> +[ 314.099052] Restarting tasks ... done.
>
> Please, have a lot at it.
This is a freezer failure while freezing kernel threads, so I don't think it's
related to ACPI or PM directly.
Does it happen on every suspend?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists