linux-kernel - [ 04/33] arm64: mm: only wrprotect clean ptes if they are present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130119010347.330247690@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:16:29 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: [ 04/33] arm64: mm: only wrprotect clean ptes if they are present

3.7-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

commit 02522463c84748b3b8ad770f9424bcfa70a5b4c4 upstream.

Marking non-present ptes as read-only can corrupt file ptes, breaking
things like swap and file mappings.

This patch ensures that we only manipulate user pte bits when the pte
is marked present.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h |   16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -132,9 +132,8 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
 #define pte_write(pte)		(!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_RDONLY))
 #define pte_exec(pte)		(!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_UXN))
 
-#define pte_present_exec_user(pte) \
-	((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER | PTE_UXN)) == \
-	 (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER))
+#define pte_present_user(pte) \
+	((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER))
 
 #define PTE_BIT_FUNC(fn,op) \
 static inline pte_t pte_##fn(pte_t pte) { pte_val(pte) op; return pte; }
@@ -157,10 +156,13 @@ extern void __sync_icache_dcache(pte_t p
 static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 			      pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
 {
-	if (pte_present_exec_user(pte))
-		__sync_icache_dcache(pte, addr);
-	if (!pte_dirty(pte))
-		pte = pte_wrprotect(pte);
+	if (pte_present_user(pte)) {
+		if (pte_exec(pte))
+			__sync_icache_dcache(pte, addr);
+		if (!pte_dirty(pte))
+			pte = pte_wrprotect(pte);
+	}
+
 	set_pte(ptep, pte);
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/