[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50FAA942.2050507@synopsys.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:40:10 +0530
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/76] ARC: Signal handling
On Saturday 19 January 2013 08:53 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:54:33PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> +SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn)
>> +{
>> + struct rt_sigframe __user *sf;
>> + unsigned int magic;
>> + int err;
>> + struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> ITYM current_pt_regs()...
Done.
>
>> + if (unlikely(is_do_ss_needed(magic)))
>> + if (do_sigaltstack(&sf->uc.uc_stack, NULL, regs->sp) == -EFAULT)
> if (!restore_altstack(&sf->uc.uc_stack))
> please...
>
>> + stk.ss_sp = (void __user *)current->sas_ss_sp;
>> + stk.ss_flags = sas_ss_flags(regs->sp);
>> + stk.ss_size = current->sas_ss_size;
>> + err |= __copy_to_user(&sf->uc.uc_stack, &stk, sizeof(stk));
> that would be
> err |= __save_altstack(&frame->uc.uc_stack, regs->sp);
>
Actually altstack consolidation tracking changes are already present in patch
41/76 - which has other 3.8 specific bits too. This is more of a reflection of my
3.7 baseline and a subsequent migration to 3.8. But you are right, it is creating
undue confusion - I'll chop-n-dice-n-squash those bits into appropriate patches.
Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists