linux-kernel - Re: LIO - the broken iSCSI target implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJAFBLAoSXNL=iPSueH0f+7dEtHC9idfd6gBH4s-JQi7pExhAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:36:12 +0100
From:	Fubo Chen <fubo.chen@...il.com>
To:	promo@...rwindsoftware.com
Cc:	fa.linux.kernel@...glegroups.com, Andreas Steinmetz <ast@...dv.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: LIO - the broken iSCSI target implementation

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:21 PM,  <promo@...rwindsoftware.com> wrote:
> Please don't start another "SCST Vs. LIO" holy war here. We all know why LIO belongs to Linux kernel and SCST does not.

SCST is not familiar to me. Does this mean that SCST is competition
for the StarWind products but LIO not ?

Fubo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/