linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/21] NTB: Update Version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:47:14 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] NTB: Update Version

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:02:29AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> Update NTB version to 0.25
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> index b792ccd..df86882 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
>  #include "ntb_regs.h"
>  
>  #define NTB_NAME	"Intel(R) PCI-E Non-Transparent Bridge Driver"
> -#define NTB_VER		"0.24"
> +#define NTB_VER		"0.25"

I'm not objecting to this, but in the end, does it really matter?  Why
not just stick with whatever kernel version you are using?  Keeping this
up to date is going to be hard over the long haul, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/