lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130120234714.GA21708@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:47:14 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] NTB: Update Version

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:02:29AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> Update NTB version to 0.25
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> index b792ccd..df86882 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
>  #include "ntb_regs.h"
>  
>  #define NTB_NAME	"Intel(R) PCI-E Non-Transparent Bridge Driver"
> -#define NTB_VER		"0.24"
> +#define NTB_VER		"0.25"

I'm not objecting to this, but in the end, does it really matter?  Why
not just stick with whatever kernel version you are using?  Keeping this
up to date is going to be hard over the long haul, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ