linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] OPP usage fixes for RCU locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ0PZbS6Ka7ZNJ+a4kXW89dYgwASWA_3pYQFPFtTNv8DwwQzLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:45:32 +0900
From:	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kevin <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lo <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, Jack <jack@...ed.me.uk>,
	Alexander <holler@...oftware.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] OPP usage fixes for RCU locking

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2013 01:52:31 PM Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Despite being documented in function documentation and in
>> Documentation/power/opp.txt, many of the users of OPP APIs
>> dont honor RCU lock usage appropriately.
>>
>> This recently appeared in IRC discussion earlier today [1].
>> I did an audit of current usage and the following series
>> is a result of this.
>>
>> NOTE:
>> 1. The patch "PM / devfreq: exynos4_bus: honor RCU lock usage" has only
>>    been build tested as I dont have an exynos platform to try it on. I have
>>    tried to make it as least intrusive as possible and at least reviewed
>>    to ensure I haven't screwed anything up.
>>
>> Other than this, I have added appropriate tested by information in requisite
>> patches.
>
> Thanks for the fixes.
>
> MyungJoo, do you want me to take the devfreq ones too?
>
> Rafael

Yes, please take RCU-OPP patches. Having those patches splitted
doesn't seem beneficial.

I'll let other devfreq patches be based on this after you get them applied.




Cheers,
MyungJoo

>
>
>> Series is based off: v3.8-rc4 tag
>> Also available in the following location[2]:
>> https://github.com/nmenon/linux-2.6-playground branch: post/pm/opp-fixes-v1
>>
>> Nishanth Menon (4):
>>   cpufreq: OMAP: use RCU locks around usage of OPP
>>   cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: use RCU locks around usage of OPP
>>   PM / devfreq: add locking documentation for recommend_opp
>>   PM / devfreq: exynos4_bus: honor RCU lock usage
>>
>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c |    5 +++
>>  drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c |    3 ++
>>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c      |    5 +++
>>  drivers/devfreq/exynos4_bus.c  |   94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> [1] http://www.beagleboard.org/irclogs/index.php?date=2013-01-18#T14:14:07
>> [2] https://github.com/nmenon/linux-2.6-playground/commits/post/pm/opp-fixes-v1
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nishanth Menon
>>
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
MyungJoo Ham, Ph.D.
Mobile Software Platform Lab, DMC Business, Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/