[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50FCEB72.1040507@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:17:06 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm
tree related)
Hi Stephen,
On 01/21/2013 02:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_find_in_range_node':
> mm/memblock.c:104:2: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct movablecore_map'
> mm/memblock.c:123:4: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct movablecore_map'
> mm/memblock.c:130:7: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct movablecore_map'
> mm/memblock.c:131:4: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct movablecore_map'
>
> Caused by commit "page_alloc: bootmem limit with movablecore_map" from
> the akpm tree. The definition of struct movablecore_map is protected by
> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP but its use is not.
>
> I have reverted that commit for today.
Thank you very much for reporting this. It was my mistake to miss this
definition.
I will post a new version of "page_alloc: bootmem limit with
movablecore_map" since
you have reverted it.
CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is selected by x86=y, but I don't have any
non-x86 box.
So I didn't test it. Please tell me if you have any problem with it on
other platforms.
Thanks. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists