linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 17/76] ARC: Process-creation/scheduling/idle-loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50FD2432.8010201@synopsys.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:49:14 +0530
From:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/76] ARC: Process-creation/scheduling/idle-loop

On Friday 18 January 2013 08:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> +void cpu_idle(void)
>> +{
>> +       /* Since we SLEEP in idle loop, TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can't be set */
>> +
>> +       /* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
>> +       while (1) {
>> +               tick_nohz_idle_enter();
>> +               rcu_idle_enter();
>> +
>> +               while (!need_resched())
>> +                       arch_idle();
>> +
>> +               rcu_idle_exit();
>> +               tick_nohz_idle_exit();
>> +
>> +               schedule_preempt_disabled();
>> +       }
>> +}
> Unless I'm mistaken, you have introduced the classic sleep race
> here, where an interrupt can happen between the check for
> need_resched() and the sleep instruction in arch_idle().

Hmm... there is indeed a race - so we could end up missing a reschedule
opportunity, for until next interrupt (so next tick, if NOHZ is not enabled, and
indefinitely if system has no other interrupting sources).


> To avoid that, you need to disable interrupts around
> the inner loop. The sleep instruction should return with
> interrupts implicitly enabled if ARC behaves like most
> other architectures doing this.
>
> 	Arnd

Indeed sleep has option to turn on interrupts before it commits - so this is
certainly doable.

 static inline void arch_idle(void)
 {
-       __asm__("sleep");
+       /* sleep, but enable all interrupts before committing */
+       __asm__("sleep 0x3");
 }


-               while (!need_resched())
+doze:
+               local_irq_disable();
+               if (!need_resched()) {
                        arch_idle();
+                       goto doze;
+               } else {
+                       local_irq_enable();
+               }


Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/