[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50FD2B30.20100@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:49:04 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
ananth@...ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
jbaron@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] kprobes: constify check_kprobe_address_safe and
friends
(2013/01/10 8:09), Sasha Levin wrote:
> Constify the parameters of lookup functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes-opt.c | 8 ++++----
> kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes-opt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes-opt.c
> index c5e410e..5876966 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes-opt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes-opt.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int __kprobes copy_optimized_instructions(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
> }
>
> /* Check whether insn is indirect jump */
> -static int __kprobes insn_is_indirect_jump(struct insn *insn)
> +static int __kprobes insn_is_indirect_jump(const struct insn *insn)
> {
> return ((insn->opcode.bytes[0] == 0xff &&
> (X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.value) & 6) == 4) || /* Jump */
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int __kprobes insn_is_indirect_jump(struct insn *insn)
> }
>
> /* Check whether insn jumps into specified address range */
> -static int insn_jump_into_range(struct insn *insn, unsigned long start, int len)
> +static int insn_jump_into_range(const struct insn *insn, unsigned long start, int len)
> {
> unsigned long target = 0;
>
These are OK for me.
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int __kprobes can_optimize(unsigned long paddr)
> }
>
> /* Check optimized_kprobe can actually be optimized. */
> -int __kprobes arch_check_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
> +int __kprobes arch_check_optimized_kprobe(const struct optimized_kprobe *op)
> {
> int i;
> struct kprobe *p;
This can be change optimized_kprobe inside, e.g. change flags.
IMHO, I don't like to change this interface.
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ int __kprobes arch_check_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
>
> /* Check the addr is within the optimized instructions. */
> int __kprobes
> -arch_within_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, unsigned long addr)
> +arch_within_optimized_kprobe(const struct optimized_kprobe *op, unsigned long addr)
> {
> return ((unsigned long)op->kp.addr <= addr &&
> (unsigned long)op->kp.addr + op->optinsn.size > addr);
This is OK for me. But you need to update the prototype in
include/linux/kprobes.h too.
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 098f396..7daddb0 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ static inline int check_kprobe_rereg(struct kprobe *p)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static __kprobes int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> +static __kprobes int check_kprobe_address_safe(const struct kprobe *p,
> struct module **probed_mod)
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
No, p is NOT constant in this function. This changes p->flags.
---
#ifdef KPROBES_CAN_USE_FTRACE
/* Given address is not on the instruction boundary */
if ((unsigned long)p->addr != ftrace_addr)
return -EILSEQ;
p->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_FTRACE;
#else /* !KPROBES_CAN_USE_FTRACE */
---
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists