linux-kernel - Re: Performance issue since 3.2.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18379918.sbmR7uiKVn@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:49:34 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Olivier Doucet <webmaster@...ux.com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue since 3.2.6

On Monday, January 21, 2013 03:26:10 PM Olivier Doucet wrote:
> >> FYI, I benchmarked a new version with :
> >> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME=y
> >> CONFIG_PM=y
> >>
> >> but the performance loss is still present.
> >
> > In that case it is not quite likely that the commit you bisected to
> > really introduced the problem, because it doesn't change things for
> > CONFIG_PM=y.
> >
> > Does reverting that commit still help?
> 
> I tested several combinations. Results follows :
> 3.2.6 (base) + CONFIG_PM unset  => BAD
> 3.2.6 (base) + CONFIG_PM=y  => BAD
> 3.2.6 (base) + patch reverted + CONFIG_PM=y  => BAD
> 3.2.6 (base) + patch reverted + CONFIG_PM unset  => GOOD

I see.  Two bugs, then.

> So if I understand right, the targeted patch introduced the bug when
> CONFIG_PM is unset, but there is an other bug when this var is set.
> I'll try to track this commit.

Thanks a lot!

Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/