linux-kernel - Re: [Linux-c6x-dev] [PATCH 3/9] c6x: Provide dma_mmap_coherent() and dma_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1358809159.3975.63.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:59:19 +0000
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-c6x-dev] [PATCH 3/9] c6x: Provide dma_mmap_coherent()
 and dma_get_sgtable()

On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 21:00 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:56 PM, James Bottomley
> <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 15:07 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> On 1/15/2013 10:13 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > Marek?
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Vineet Gupta
> >> > <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Monday 14 January 2013 09:07 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
> >> > >> On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 11:44 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > >>> c6x/allmodconfig (assumed):
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c: In function ‘vb2_dc_mmap’:
> >> > >>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c:204: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dma_mmap_coherent’
> >> > >>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c: In function ‘vb2_dc_get_base_sgt’:
> >> > >>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c:387: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dma_get_sgtable’
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> For architectures using dma_map_ops, dma_mmap_coherent() and
> >> > >>> dma_get_sgtable() are provided in <asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h>.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> C6x does not use dma_map_ops, hence it should implement them as inline
> >> > >>> stubs using dma_common_mmap() and dma_common_get_sgtable().
> >> > >>>
> >> > >> So are dma_mmap_coherent() and dma_get_sgtable() part of the DMA API
> >> > >> now? I don't them in Documentation/DMA*.txt anywhere.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Why does the default dma_common_mmap() for !CONFIG_MMU return an
> >> > >> error?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Wouldn't it be better to provide default implementations that an arch
> >> > >> could override rather than having to patch all "no dma_map_ops"
> >> > >> architectures?
> >> > >>
> >> > > Speaking for the still-reviewed ARC Port, I completely agree with Mark.
> >>
> >> dma_mmap_coherent() was partially in the DMA mapping API for some time, but
> >> it was available only on a few architectures (afair ARM, powerpc and avr32).
> >> This caused significant problems for writing unified device drivers or some
> >> device helper modules which were aimed to work on more than one
> >> architecture.
> >>
> >> dma_get_sgtable() is an extension discussed during the Linaro meetings. It
> >> is required to correctly implement buffer sharing between device driver
> >> without hacks or any assumptions about memory layout in the device drivers.
> >>
> >> I have implemented some generic code for both of those two functions,
> >> keeping
> >> in mind that on some hardware architectures (like already mentioned VIVT)
> >> it might be not possible to provide coherent mapping to userspace. It is
> >> perfectly fine for those functions to return an error in such case.
> >
> > It's not possible on VIPT either.  This means that the API is unusable
> > on quite a large number of architectures.  Surely, if we're starting to
> > write drivers using this, we need to fix the API before more people try
> > to use it.
> >
> > For PA-RISC (and all other VIPT, I assume) I need an API which allows me
> > to remap the virtual address of the kernel component (probably using the
> > kmap area) so the user space and kernel space addresses are congruent.
> 
> So what are we gonna do for 3.8? I'd like to get my allmodconfig build
> green again ;-)
> 
> Change the API?

Well, if we want the API to work universally, we have to.  As I said,
for VIPT systems, the only coherency mechanism we have is the virtual
address ... we have to fix that in the kernel to be congruent with the
userspace virtual address if we want coherency between the kernel and
userspace.

However, if it only needs to work on ARM and x86, it can stay the way it
is and we could just pull it out of the generic core.

Who actually wants to use this API, and what for?

> Keep the API but do a best-effort fix to unbreak the builds?
>   - Apply my patches that got acks (avr32/blackfin/cris/m68k),
>   - Use static inlines that return -EINVAL for the rest
> (c6x/frv/mn10300/parisc/xtensa).
> I still have a few m68k fixes queued for 3.8, for which I've been postponing the
> pull request to get this sorted out, so I could include the above.
> 
> Any other solution?

If it's an API that only works on ARM and x86, there's not much point
pretending it's universal, so we should remove it from the generic arch
code and allow only those architectures which can use it.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/