[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130121153002.1f7f9ff1b46532a44704c6c0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:30:02 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
Hi Mimi,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:10:23 -0500 Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry Stephen, the merged result should look like what's contained in
> linux-integrity/next-upstreamed-patches:
>
> int ima_module_check(struct file *file)
> {
> if (!file) {
> if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES) &&
> (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)) {
> #ifndef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
> return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
> #endif
> }
> return 0;
> }
> return process_measurement(file, file->f_dentry->d_name.name,
> MAY_EXEC, MODULE_CHECK);
> }
OK, I will use that version tomorrow.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists