[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50FDD6F1.5030208@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:01:53 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre@...rep.de>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] kernel 3.7+ cpufreq regression on AMD system running
as dom0
On 01/18/2013 02:00 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
> So something like this in the hypervisor maybe (not even tested):
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c
> index a9b7792..54e7808 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,40 @@ static int powernow_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#define MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE 0xc0010064
> +static void amd_fixup_frequency(struct xen_processor_px *px, int i)
> +{
> + u32 hi, lo, fid, did;
> + int index = px->control & 0x00000007;
> +
> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
> + return;
> +
> + if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10)
> + || boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) {
> + rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE + index, lo, hi);
> + /* Bit 63 indicates whether contents are valid */
> + if (!(hi & 0x80000000))
> + return;
> +
> + fid = lo & 0x3f;
> + did = (lo >> 6) & 7;
> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10)
> + px->core_frequency = (100 * (fid + 0x10)) >> did;
> + else
> + px->core_frequency = (100 * (fid + 8)) >> did;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void amd_fixup_freq(struct processor_performance *perf)
> +{
>
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < perf->state_count; i++)
> + amd_fixup_frequency(perf->states, i);
amd_fixup_frequency(&perf->states[i]) will walk P-states.
> +
> +}
> static int powernow_cpufreq_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data;
> @@ -158,6 +191,8 @@ static int powernow_cpufreq_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> perf = &processor_pminfo[policy->cpu]->perf;
>
> + amd_fixup_freq(perf);
Maybe move to powernow_cpufreq_cpu_init(), although this works too.
-boris
> +
> cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0,
> perf->states[perf->platform_limit].core_frequency * 1000);
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists