linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/13] perf gtk/browser: Add support for event group view

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pq0xkbcj.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:58:36 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] perf gtk/browser: Add support for event group view

Hi Arnaldo,

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:28:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:25:02PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Adding current header name to event name will fix the problem but it
>> probably occupies too much screen width especially for long named
>> tracepoint or PMU-specific events like
>> "compaction:mm_compaction_isolate_migratepages".
>> 
>>   Overhead/branches  Overhead/branch-misses  sys/branches  sys/branch-misses  usr/branches  usr/branch-misses  Command  Shared Object   Symbol
>>   .................  ......................  ............  .................  ............  .................  .......  .............  .......
>>              98.32%                  31.16%         0.00%              0.00%        98.32%             31.16%    a.out          a.out  [.] foo
>> 
>> 
>> If you have a better idea or other way to place the cursor without
>> printing bogus 0.00% on GTK, please let me know.
>
> Compacting it using an extra line:
>
>  Overhead...............  sys....................  usr....................
>  branches  branch-misses  branches  branch-misses  branches  branch-misses  Command  Shared Object   Symbol
>  ........  .............  ........  .............  ........  .............  .......  .............  .......
>    98.32%         31.16%     0.00%          0.00%    98.32%         31.16%    a.out          a.out  [.] foo
>
> It could even use some reference:
>
>  Overhead.....................  sys.........  usr...........
>  branches(1)  branch-misses(2)  (1)    (2)    (1)     (2)     Command  Shared Object   Symbol
>  ...........  ................  .....  .....  ......  ......  .......  .............  .......
>       98.32%            31.16%  0.00%  0.00%  98.32%  31.16%    a.out          a.out  [.] foo
>
> The (1) could be done with a superscript number or even just using a
> different fore/background color, to use fewer columns.
>
> One other way, that would scale for really long event names, would be to
> have the event list in the first few lines and then:
>
> Events:
> 1. branches
> 2. branch-misses
>
>  Overhead......  sys.........  usr...........
>  (1)     (2)     (1)    (2)    (1)     (2)     Command  Shared Object   Symbol
>  ......  ......  .....  .....  ......  ......  .......  .............  .......
>  98.32%  31.16%  0.00%  0.00%  98.32%  31.16%   a.out           a.out  [.] foo
>
> I think you could switch to/from each of these forms using a hotkey,
> that would influence how the hist_entry__snprintf() routine would work,
> either using perf_evsel__name() or evsel->idx :-)
>
> This way if at some point the user wants to expand/compress the lines,
> it will be possible to do so quickly, just pressing the hotkey.

By saying hotkey, I guess you meant to use it for TUI.  However TUI
doesn't provide those header lines. ;-)

As this extra line (and hotkey) thing might add complexity to the
patchset, I'd like to separate it to a different work and to focus on
the basic feature with current behavior.  Is it acceptable for you?

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/