| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130122073315.13822.27093.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:03:22 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl, sbw@....edu,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/45] percpu_rwlock: Introduce the global reader-writer
lock backend
A straight-forward (and obvious) algorithm to implement Per-CPU Reader-Writer
locks can also lead to too many deadlock possibilities which can make it very
hard/impossible to use. This is explained in the example below, which helps
justify the need for a different algorithm to implement flexible Per-CPU
Reader-Writer locks.
We can use global rwlocks as shown below safely, without fear of deadlocks:
Readers:
CPU 0 CPU 1
------ ------
1. spin_lock(&random_lock); read_lock(&my_rwlock);
2. read_lock(&my_rwlock); spin_lock(&random_lock);
Writer:
CPU 2:
------
write_lock(&my_rwlock);
We can observe that there is no possibility of deadlocks or circular locking
dependencies here. Its perfectly safe.
Now consider a blind/straight-forward conversion of global rwlocks to per-CPU
rwlocks like this:
The reader locks its own per-CPU rwlock for read, and proceeds.
Something like: read_lock(per-cpu rwlock of this cpu);
The writer acquires all per-CPU rwlocks for write and only then proceeds.
Something like:
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
write_lock(per-cpu rwlock of 'cpu');
Now let's say that for performance reasons, the above scenario (which was
perfectly safe when using global rwlocks) was converted to use per-CPU rwlocks.
CPU 0 CPU 1
------ ------
1. spin_lock(&random_lock); read_lock(my_rwlock of CPU 1);
2. read_lock(my_rwlock of CPU 0); spin_lock(&random_lock);
Writer:
CPU 2:
------
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
write_lock(my_rwlock of 'cpu');
Consider what happens if the writer begins his operation in between steps 1
and 2 at the reader side. It becomes evident that we end up in a (previously
non-existent) deadlock due to a circular locking dependency between the 3
entities, like this:
(holds Waiting for
random_lock) CPU 0 -------------> CPU 2 (holds my_rwlock of CPU 0
for write)
^ |
| |
Waiting| | Waiting
for | | for
| V
------ CPU 1 <------
(holds my_rwlock of
CPU 1 for read)
So obviously this "straight-forward" way of implementing percpu rwlocks is
deadlock-prone. One simple measure for (or characteristic of) safe percpu
rwlock should be that if a user replaces global rwlocks with per-CPU rwlocks
(for performance reasons), he shouldn't suddenly end up in numerous deadlock
possibilities which never existed before. The replacement should continue to
remain safe, and perhaps improve the performance.
Observing the robustness of global rwlocks in providing a fair amount of
deadlock safety, we implement per-CPU rwlocks as nothing but global rwlocks,
as a first step.
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/Kconfig | 3 ++
lib/Makefile | 1 +
lib/percpu-rwlock.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h
create mode 100644 lib/percpu-rwlock.c
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..45620d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Flexible Per-CPU Reader-Writer Locks
+ * (with relaxed locking rules and reduced deadlock-possibilities)
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2012-2013
+ * Author: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * With lots of invaluable suggestions from:
+ * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
+ * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifndef _LINUX_PERCPU_RWLOCK_H
+#define _LINUX_PERCPU_RWLOCK_H
+
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+struct percpu_rwlock {
+ rwlock_t global_rwlock;
+};
+
+extern void percpu_read_lock(struct percpu_rwlock *);
+extern void percpu_read_unlock(struct percpu_rwlock *);
+
+extern void percpu_write_lock(struct percpu_rwlock *);
+extern void percpu_write_unlock(struct percpu_rwlock *);
+
+extern int __percpu_init_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *,
+ const char *, struct lock_class_key *);
+
+#define percpu_init_rwlock(pcpu_rwlock) \
+({ static struct lock_class_key rwlock_key; \
+ __percpu_init_rwlock(pcpu_rwlock, #pcpu_rwlock, &rwlock_key); \
+})
+
+#endif
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
index 75cdb77..32fb0b9 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/Kconfig
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ config STMP_DEVICE
config PERCPU_RWSEM
boolean
+config PERCPU_RWLOCK
+ boolean
+
config CRC_CCITT
tristate "CRC-CCITT functions"
help
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index 02ed6c0..1854b5e 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock_debug.o
lib-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o
lib-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM) += rwsem.o
lib-$(CONFIG_PERCPU_RWSEM) += percpu-rwsem.o
+lib-$(CONFIG_PERCPU_RWLOCK) += percpu-rwlock.o
CFLAGS_hweight.o = $(subst $(quote),,$(CONFIG_ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS))
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_HWEIGHT) += hweight.o
diff --git a/lib/percpu-rwlock.c b/lib/percpu-rwlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..af0c714
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/percpu-rwlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Flexible Per-CPU Reader-Writer Locks
+ * (with relaxed locking rules and reduced deadlock-possibilities)
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2012-2013
+ * Author: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * With lots of invaluable suggestions from:
+ * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
+ * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#include <linux/percpu-rwlock.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+
+
+int __percpu_init_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock,
+ const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwlock_key)
+{
+ /* ->global_rwlock represents the whole percpu_rwlock for lockdep */
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
+ __rwlock_init(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock, name, rwlock_key);
+#else
+ pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock =
+ __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock);
+#endif
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void percpu_read_lock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock)
+{
+ read_lock(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock);
+}
+
+void percpu_read_unlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock)
+{
+ read_unlock(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock);
+}
+
+void percpu_write_lock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock)
+{
+ write_lock(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock);
+}
+
+void percpu_write_unlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock)
+{
+ write_unlock(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock);
+}
+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists