[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130122073557.13822.60411.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:05:59 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl, sbw@....edu,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 12/45] sched/migration: Use raw_spin_lock/unlock since
interrupts are already disabled
We need not use the raw_spin_lock_irqsave/restore primitives because
all CPU_DYING notifiers run with interrupts disabled. So just use
raw_spin_lock/unlock.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c1596ac..c2cec88 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4869,9 +4869,7 @@ static void calc_load_migrate(struct rq *rq)
* Migrate all tasks from the rq, sleeping tasks will be migrated by
* try_to_wake_up()->select_task_rq().
*
- * Called with rq->lock held even though we'er in stop_machine() and
- * there's no concurrency possible, we hold the required locks anyway
- * because of lock validation efforts.
+ * Called with rq->lock held.
*/
static void migrate_tasks(unsigned int dead_cpu)
{
@@ -4883,8 +4881,8 @@ static void migrate_tasks(unsigned int dead_cpu)
* Fudge the rq selection such that the below task selection loop
* doesn't get stuck on the currently eligible stop task.
*
- * We're currently inside stop_machine() and the rq is either stuck
- * in the stop_machine_cpu_stop() loop, or we're executing this code,
+ * We're currently inside stop_one_cpu() and the rq is either stuck
+ * in the cpu_stopper_thread(), or we're executing this code,
* either way we should never end up calling schedule() until we're
* done here.
*/
@@ -5153,14 +5151,14 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
case CPU_DYING:
sched_ttwu_pending();
/* Update our root-domain */
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); /* Interrupts already disabled */
if (rq->rd) {
BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
set_rq_offline(rq);
}
migrate_tasks(cpu);
BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 1); /* the migration thread */
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
break;
case CPU_DEAD:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists