linux-kernel - [PATCH V3 RESEND RFC 0/2] kvm: Improving undercommit scenarios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:08:54 +0530
From:	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Srikar <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@...pitt.edu>,
	Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
	"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 RESEND RFC 0/2] kvm: Improving undercommit scenarios

 In some special scenarios like #vcpu <= #pcpu, PLE handler may
prove very costly, because there is no need to iterate over vcpus
and do unsuccessful yield_to burning CPU.

 The first patch optimizes all the yield_to by bailing out when there
 is no need to continue in yield_to (i.e., when there is only one task 
 in source and target rq).

 Second patch uses that in PLE handler. Further when a yield_to fails
 we do not immediately go out of PLE handler instead we try thrice 
 to have better statistical possibility of false return. Otherwise that
 would affect moderate overcommit cases.
 
 Result on 3.7.0-rc6 kernel shows around 140% improvement for ebizzy 1x and
 around 51% for dbench 1x  with 32 core PLE machine with 32 vcpu guest.


base = 3.7.0-rc6 
machine: 32 core mx3850 x5 PLE mc

--+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
               ebizzy (rec/sec higher is beter)
--+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
    base        stdev       patched     stdev       %improve     
--+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x   2511.3000    21.5409    6051.8000   170.2592   140.98276   
2x   2679.4000   332.4482    2692.3000   251.4005     0.48145
3x   2253.5000   266.4243    2192.1667   178.9753    -2.72169
--+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+

--+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
        dbench (throughput in MB/sec. higher is better)
--+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
    base        stdev       patched     stdev       %improve     
--+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x  6677.4080   638.5048    10098.0060   3449.7026     51.22643
2x  2012.6760    64.7642    2019.0440     62.6702       0.31639
3x  1302.0783    40.8336    1292.7517     27.0515      -0.71629
--+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+

Here is the refernce of no ple result.
 ebizzy-1x_nople 7592.6000 rec/sec
 dbench_1x_nople 7853.6960 MB/sec

The result says we can still improve by 60% for ebizzy, but overall we are
getting impressive performance with the patches.

 Changes Since V2:
 - Dropped global measures usage patch (Peter Zilstra)
 - Do not bail out on first failure (Avi Kivity)
 - Try thrice for the failure of yield_to to get statistically more correct
   behaviour.

 Changes since V1:
 - Discard the idea of exporting nrrunning and optimize in core scheduler (Peter)
 - Use yield() instead of schedule in overcommit scenarios (Rik)
 - Use loadavg knowledge to detect undercommit/overcommit

 Peter Zijlstra (1):
  Bail out of yield_to when source and target runqueue has one task

 Raghavendra K T (1):
  Handle yield_to failure return for potential undercommit case

 Please let me know your comments and suggestions.

 Link for the discussion of V3 original:
 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/26/166

 Link for V2:
 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/287

 Link for V1:
 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/21/168

 kernel/sched/core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/