lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:07:17 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Use generic irqchip_init()

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:29:12PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:03:01AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:54:39AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:16:12AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > The asm/hardware/gic.h header does no longer exist and the corresponding
> > > > functionality was moved to linux/irqchip.h and linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
> > > > respectively. gic_handle_irq() and of_irq_init() are no longer available
> > > > either and have been replaced by irqchip_init().
> > > 
> > > asm/hardware/gic.h Seems to still exist in Linus's tree.
> > > Could you let me know which tree of which branch I should depend on
> > > in order to apply this change?
> > 
> > I found this when doing an automated build over all ARM defconfigs on
> > linux-next.
> > 
> > Commit 520f7bd73354f003a9a59937b28e4903d985c420 "irqchip: Move ARM gic.h
> > to include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h" moved the file and was merged
> > through Olof Johansson's next/cleanup and for-next branches.
> > 
> > Adding Olof on Cc since I'm not quite sure myself about how this is
> > handled.
> 
> The way to handle this is to base the branch you are adding new shmobile code
> in, on top of the cleanup branches that changes the underlying infrastructure.
> This is why we merge it early during the release, so that new code for various
> platforms can be based on it to avoid a bunch of conflicts in the end.
> 
> In this case, you might need to base your branch onto a merge of both
> the irqchip/gic-vic-move and timer/cleanup branches from arm-soc.

Thanks, I'll take a look at rebasing accordingly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ