[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201301220827.55209.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:27:54 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>,
Linux ARM Kernel ML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: One of these things (CONFIG_HZ) is not like the others..
On Monday 21 January 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> In this particular case, EBSA110 is not a candidate for multi-arch
> build anyway, because it's ARMv4 and we're only really bothering with
> ARMv6 and better.
>
> Not only that, but the IO stuff on it is sufficiently obscure and
> non-standard...
Right, no point worrying about EBSA110. We need to work out OMAP and
Exynos/S5P though: As long as OMAP needs 128HZ and Exynos needs 200HZ,
we can never have them in the same kernel.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists