[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2460397.W1PpBYs6jy@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 03:11:32 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / PM: Sanitize checks in acpi_power_on_resources()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
After the only user of acpi_power_on_resources(),
acpi_bus_init_power(), has been changed to avoid calling it
for state equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, it doesn't have to special
case that state any more.
For this reason, modify the checks in acpi_power_on_resources()
so that it returns -EINVAL for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD as it should.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/power.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/power.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c
@@ -622,12 +622,9 @@ int acpi_power_get_inferred_state(struct
int acpi_power_on_resources(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
{
- if (!device || state < ACPI_STATE_D0 || state > ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD)
+ if (!device || state < ACPI_STATE_D0 || state > ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT)
return -EINVAL;
- if (state == ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD)
- return 0;
-
return acpi_power_on_list(&device->power.states[state].resources);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists