[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130122135726.GD1037@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:57:26 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@...stprotocols.net, Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
paulus@...ba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix compile warnings in tests/attr.c
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:38:23PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Jiri Olsa [jolsa@...hat.com] wrote:
> | On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:30:52PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
> __u64 is 'unsigned long long' on x86 and PRIu64 is 'llu' which is fine.
>
> __u64 is 'unsigned long' on Power and PRIu64 is 'lu' which is again fine.
>
> But __u64 is 'unsigned long long' on x86_64, but PRIu64 is '%lu' bc __WORDSIZE
> is 64.
>
> On x86_64, shouldn't __u64, be defined as 'unsigned long' rather than
> 'unsigned long long' - ie include 'int-l64.h' rather than 'int-ll64.h' ?
hum, not sure ;-) will try to find some time to look on that
>
> BTW, does 'perf' with my patch compile, (with warnings) for you on x86_64
> with 'WERROR=0 make' ?
this one passes with warnings
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists