linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/15] staging/omapdrm: don't build on multiplatform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201301221747.24618.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:47:24 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Rob Clark <rob@...com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arm@...nel.org,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] staging/omapdrm: don't build on multiplatform

On Tuesday 22 January 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Ie. I'd prefer to re-enable omapdss on multi-plat rather than
> > disabling omapdrm.  With changes in drm core, it is a bit of a pain
> > to compile test all the arm drivers by doing N different builds, so
> > we've been trying to get to the point of all arm drm drivers
> > supporting multi-plat
> 
> Ok, I'll let you and Arnd fight it out and drop this patch from my
> to-apply queue for now...

If Rob thinks there is no danger in allowing omap2_dss to be built
on all platforms, and Tomi has no objections, I'm fine with that, too.
In general, that is the right solution, I was just trying to be
conservative for the 3.8 cycle.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/